The
pitchers that attended the Northwoods League all-star game were a little more
difficult to get a read on. The pre-game workout that I talked about last week
was set up primarily for the positional prospects, as the only pitchers that
took part of the bullpen sessions were the ones that attended the workout that
were not selected to participate in the game itself.
With
12 pitchers in attendance for each team, and all 12 slated to see time in the
game, the most any pitcher threw was one full inning. Several pitchers were
scheduled to pitch only one out, with several others allowed to toss only
two-thirds of an inning. One pitcher, Mankato left-handed Jimmy Reyes (Elon)
needed only one pitch, a 88 mph fastball, to get the only out he was scheduled
to record. That particular instance was somewhat disappointing, since Reyes was
one of the pitchers I was more excited to see given the reports I had received
on him prior to the day’s events.
That
said, five pitchers from each squad caught my eye, and I’m going to profile
those 10 pitchers here.
The
South
With
the Madison Mallards hosting the event, the South squad took the field first
behind hometown Mallard Matt Jansen, a lefty from Purdue.
The
book on Jansen going into the game was that he was a prototypical lefty, a guy
that recorded outs more by changing speeds and hitting his spots than by
blowing batters away. He quickly showed that there was more to his game before
being labeled a finesse lefty.
Jansen,
who has a very good fastball-curveball-changeup repertoire, threw mostly
fastballs in his inning of work. His fastball peaked at 91, the last pitch he
threw, a high fastball to North catcher Carlos Ramirez that resulted in a
swinging strikeout. In fact, Jansen struck out the side to open the game,
getting the home run derby champ, Michael Rockett, and the league leader in
hits, Derek McCallum, swinging before Ramirez went down on strikes. He got all
three on high fastballs, which sat in the 87-90 range.
Of
course knowing that he’s working only one inning Jansen was able to reach back
for a little more than he usually would. He normally works in the 85-88 range,
and throws more offspeed pitches. Regardless, he pitched aggressively and
showed that he does have a little extra in the tank that he’s able to reach
back and get when he needs to.
Eau
Claire’s
Chris Odegaard (Minnesota State-Mankato) pitched the third inning for the South
squad. He entered the game among the league leaders in ERA (1.42), strikeouts
(50) and walks (26). I was a little concerned about the lofty walk total
entering the game, but was somewhat encouraged by the fact that when he misses,
he misses low, and he doesn’t give up many hits, meaning he’s less likely to
succumb to the big inning.
As
a right-handed pitcher, his fastball topped out at 90, pitching comfortably in
the 88-90 range during his one inning of work while showing a very nice,
well-rounded repertoire that includes what appeared to be both a curveball and
a slider as well as a changeup. His curveball is a really nice pitch, a true
and sharp downer that he snaps off consistently and effortlessly. He moved the
ball well around the zone and showed no problems changing speeds.
Topping
out at 90 mph down the road will be a concern as a right-handed pitcher, and
Odegaard will need to throw more strikes more consistently, regardless of where
he’s missing, if he’s going to enjoy continued success as a professional, but
his stuff could easily translate to him having success right now if he were
pitching at a rookie level or A-ball team.
La
Crosse’s
Chris Sale (Florida Gulf Coast) followed Odegaard working the fourth inning.
Entering the game, Sale was second in the league in strikeouts with 55, and
showed why he’s able to miss so many bats during the game.
A
tall, long and loose lefty, Sale has a long arm action that creates a fair
amount of deception. He pitches effectively wild, missing up a lot but having
good enough stuff for a lefty that allows him to get away with it when he does.
His first pitch was a 91 mph fastball, and he sat in the 88-91 range to go
along with a decent 79-80 changeup and a sharp 79-81 slider.
He
could stand to tighten up his mechanics a little bit, as his long-arm action
could lead to some arm troubles down the road, and he also needs to be more
consistent with his release point. However, he’s coming off of a very
successful freshman season carrying that success over to this summer, and with
his size and stuff as a tall, projectable left-handed pitcher, Sale is
definitely a name to keep an eye on for the 2010 draft.
Gabriel
Shaw (Louisville), another hometown representative from the Mallards, came in
the fifth to follow Sale. Shaw had arguably the most electric arm of any
pitcher in attendance, which prompted one scout affiliated with an American
League team that was seated next to me to comment how he wished he would have
been able to see more of Shaw, since he only faced two batters.
He
has a very athletic, wiry strong frame and delivery, which reminded me of Jake
Odorizzi (coincidentally, a once-Louisville recruit) when I saw him pitch at
the PG Indoor last February. Shaw’s first pitch was a 91 mph fastball, a pitch
that showed nice running life to it. He also mixed in a sharp 73-75 curveball
and a 77 changeup. With his arm action and running life on his fastball, I
would really be interested to see him throw a slider if that is part of his
repertoire.
His
athleticism allows him to throw effortlessly, he repeats his delivery well and
there is no wasted movement. Coming off of his freshman year, in which he led
the Cardinals in appearances, he like Sale is another arm to watch for 2010.
Battle
Creek’s
R.J. Hively (Cal State Fullerton) managed to pitch a full inning, thanks to a
double play that he induced in the ninth inning, after recording the final out
in the eighth for the South squad.
If
Shaw had the most electric arm of those in attendance, Hively arguably had the
most electric stuff. His fastball moved so much that it at first was hard to
tell if it was a fastball or a slider or a cutter. Built strongly and compact,
with a simple, compact, no-nonsense delivery, his bulldog frame and aggressive
approach reminded me of a Northwoods alum, Thomas Eager, who pitched for the
Eau Claire Express during the summer of 2006 and was drafted in the fifth round
by the Cardinals in the 2007 draft.
My
only complaint with Hively is that he needs to ditch his curveball, which isn’t
very sharp, and focus on his slider. He is a prototypical sinker-slider pitcher
when those two pitches are working for him, and he’s yet another pitcher to
keep an eye on for the 2010 draft.
The
North
The
North squad also trotted a lefty to the mound to start the game in Mankato’s
Brendan Lafferty (UCLA).
This
is Lafferty’s second tour of duty in the Northwoods League, having pitched for
the Alexandria Beetles during the summer of 2006. He earned the starting nod
for the North by posting a 3-0 record, a 2.84 ERA and a 25 to 9 strikeout to
walk ratio over 19 innings of work while limiting batters to a .182 batting
average against.
Lafferty
is a lot more projectable at the next level than his starting opponent, Matt
Jansen is, with a tall and athletic frame and long, wiry strong limbs. He has a
loose delivery, although there are some extra, moving parts to that delivery
which probably could be tightened up to increase his overall effectiveness.
While
his stuff was sharp in the starting role (87-91 fastball and a wicked 79-82
slider), he did give up a couple of runs in the first inning, and needed to use
20 pitches to get through the frame.
Lafferty
had a very good spring for the Bruins, and has the size and stuff, especially
for a lefty, that should draw quite a few looks from the scouting community in
the spring, although there are a few parts in his game that he needs to refine.
Thunder
Bay’s Nate
Woods (Belmont) followed Lafferty in the pitching order in the second inning.
Like Lafferty, Woods has a large, projectable frame that should allow him to be
able to sustain a heavy workload at the next level.
Woods
has done a very good job limiting baserunners this summer during his first
taste of collegiate summer ball. Over 41.2 innings of work entering the
all-star break, he had only allowed 23 hits and 15 walks while posting a 1.30
ERA and limiting batters to a .167 average.
His
fastball ranged from 86 (his first pitch) to 90, and that pitch showed some
nice, late movement. He also mixed in a big-breaking mid-70s curveball and a
promising changeup. Woods’ delivery, despite his size and velocity readings,
was a little on the slow side, which may make his offerings somewhat easier to
read by opposing batters, but he’s still another young, projectable and
promising pitcher that could make some noise between now and the 2010 draft.
Jimmy
Reyes, as mentioned above, was a pitcher I was looking forward to seeing. He
only threw one pitch, but I had heard quite a bit about him before attending
the day’s events.
His
one pitch was a 88 mph sinking fastball that quickly induced a weak groundball
right back to him. I’ve heard that his fastball has sat in the 87-91 range with
very good movement, and he mixes in a very good slider that has made him very
difficult to hit. At the break he had a 1.54 ERA (seventh best in the league)
while giving up only 29 hits over 41 innings of work with 37 strikeouts and
nine walks allowed.
A
pair of relievers rounded out the pitchers that made the strongest impression
on me during the game’s events.
Thunder
Bay’s
Jimmy Stanley (Belmont) came in the seventh for the North squad and continued
to pitch in the eighth.
With
a strong, compact frame he showed a long-armed, low three-quarters delivery
that creates a fair amount of deception and a good deal of late movement on his
fastball. Similar to R.J. Hively of the South squad, Stanley threw an overhand
curveball, but with his delivery and sinking fastball he would be much better
off focusing on his slider.
So
far this summer, Stanley has been nearly untouchable, posting nine saves at the
break with a 0.83 ERA and a 25 to 4 strikeout to walk ratio over 21 innings of
work.
St.
Cloud’s
Xavier Esquivel (Loyola Marymount) came in to finish the game, and showed one
of the most wicked one-two punches of any pitcher in attendance with an
aggressive delivery, a sinking fastball and arguably the best breaking pitch, a
nasty slider.
Built
short, strong and compact, he has an equally compact delivery, and shows a
no-fear approach to pitching, which makes him tailor-made for a short relief
role. At the break Esquivel had nine saves (which with Stanley led the league),
a 0.44 ERA and a 25 strikeouts over 20 innings while giving up only nine hits
and one earned run.
Extra
Workout
As
mentioned last week, there were a handful of players from the league that
attended the pre-game workout that did not participate in the all-star game.
Eight
pitchers took the bullpen mound in front of the scouts in attendance, and four
of them were particularly impressive.
Wisconsin’s
Rob Currie (Tusculum College) was a curious non-selection to the all-star game,
entering the day with a 6-0 record, a 2.81 ERA and a 46 to 16 strikeout to walk
ratio over 41.2 innings of work. His wins were tied for the best in the league,
while he was fifth in punchouts.
And
he backed up his statistical success with a strong performance during his work
in the ‘pen. He pitched consistently in the 88-90 range with a very loose arm
and a strong overall frame, while also mixing in a sharp 75-76 curveball and
advanced 78 mph changeup.
Madison’s
Alex Rivers (Santa Clara) didn’t have to travel far to attend the workout.
Unlike Currie, Rivers has a smaller, sub-six foot and compact yet strong build.
Despite his smaller size, he showed an easy arm action that produced 88-90 mph
fastballs with very good sinking action. His slow curveball clocked in the
71-73 range, and he also threw a low-80s slider, which looked as though it
would complement his sinking fastball perfectly, and a 80 mph changeup.
Fellow
Mallard Andy Deain (Northern Illinois) used a right-handed side-arm delivery to
pump his fastball in the 86-91 range, although he didn’t reach 91 until the
last pitch during his bullpen session. He showed a nice high-70s slider and
mixed in a changeup, and might have a role as a short inning specialist at the
next level.
St.
Cloud’s Kevin Johnson (Cincinnati) was the most pleasant surprise on the day,
since he hadn’t yet pitched an inning this summer for the River Bats (he was
hitting .313 as the team’s first baseman) but posted some impressive numbers as
a left-handed pitcher. His first fastball recorded 87 mph, and his next five
showed up at 90. He showed a very sharp 73-75 curveball and an impressive
low-80s changeup in which his arm did not slow down one bit relative to his
fastball delivery.
Of
the hitters that attended the workout that weren’t among the all-stars,
Wisconsin’s Kyle Bubak, who is transferring from Salt Lake Community College to
Nebraska this coming year, stood out the most. A switch-hitting
middle-infielder, Bubak showed nice infield actions and a strong arm during the
workout, although he probably profiles best at third base at the next level. He
showed intriguing bat speed and pop from the left-side of the plate, and could
be a sleeper to keep an eye on for next year’s draft.
The
thoughts and opinions listed here do not necessarily reflect those of Perfect
Game USA. Patrick Ebert is affiliated with both Perfect Game USA and
Brewerfan.net, and can be contacted via email at pebert@brewerfan.net.