Crack of the Bat
By Jim (Jimmy Z) Zellmann (Traveling Baseball Correspondent)
The Most Important Thing – FANS!
Two of the three MLB clubs with the worst attendance are in the state of Florida. Tampa Bay and the Marlins finished last and 28th among the 30 ML clubs in attendance last year. Looking at recent history (past 5 years) the low attendance figures show consistency with both clubs at or near the bottom in ML attendance.
Two of the four MLB clubs with the best attendance are both from one city. The LA Angels and LA Dodgers finished 2nd and 4th in ML attendance last year. Both LA teams have been in the top 5 each of the last three years.
LA is a sports hotbed with UCLA and Southern Cal among other big time college sports. It has the Rose Bowl and has had two NFL football teams. It has the Lakers and the Clippers in the NBA. It has NHL hockey and just about every professional sport imaginable. The ticket prices are higher than those in Florida.
Miami and Tampa/St Pete are big sports markets as well. Most Major League cities have a lot of options for residents interested in attending games. Why is the attendance so low in the baseball hotbed of Florida?
For most of the baseball season there is no other Major League sport or college sport. There’s not even any high school sport for the three main months of the baseball season.
The only thing that might be different is the weather. However, this time of the year the weather is much better in south Florida than most other parts of the country, yet the other places out draw (by a lot) the Florida teams. And the Florida Team that is last in attendance plays in an air conditioned dome. It would be interesting to see how much better Tampa Bay would draw if they were a winning team. Then again the Marlins have won two World Series and they don’t draw. This year people say the Marlins have given away their players, lowering the payroll and that is the reason for lack of support. However, where was the support in previous years?
Miami summers are HOT and it rains a lot. The park is not located in an ideal location. There are many reasons for the lack of attendance in Miami. However, they have won 2 titles with two completely different teams! If Miami had Tampa’s facility it might make a huge difference, but how can investors know for sure?
Could it be as simple as economics or the number of people who can afford to attend? Population of major markets plays a vital role in attendance figures, but smaller markets outdraw the Florida teams every year. They do it playing in some terrible weather conditions for at least the first month of the season, while it’s nice and warm in Florida. I have a hard time understanding why one of the biggest baseball hotbeds in the country is just not interested in Major League baseball. Is San Antonio the next stop? It’s hot there as well, but people seem to think MLB baseball will hit it big there.
Here is a couple charts to compare attendance figures (and population of metropolitan area) of the top and the bottom teams in attendance figures for 2005:
The top 10 in attendance last year:
1 – New York Yankees (metro population 21,578,930)
2 – Los Angeles Dodgers (metro population 17,262,730)
3 – St Louis Cardinals (metro population 2,739,000)
4 – Los Angeles Angels (metro population 17,262,730)
5 – San Francisco Giants (metro population 7,154,350)
6 – Chicago Cubs (metro population 9,549,014)
7 – San Diego Padres (metro population 2,930,886)
8 – New York Mets Mets (metro population 21,578,930)
9 – Boston Red Sox (metro population 5,611,244)
10 – Houston Astros (metro population 5,075,733)
The bottom 10 in attendance last year:
21 – Detroit Tigers (metro population 5,415,338)
22 – Minnesota Twins (metro population 3,257,711)
23 – Toronto Blue Jays (metro population 2,481,494)
24 – Cleveland Indians (metro population 2,841,155)
25 – Cincinnati Reds (metro population 2,047,333)
26 – Colorado Rockies (metro population 2,579,347)
27 – Pittsburgh Pirates (metro population 2,410,330)
28 – Florida Marlins (metro population 5,288,796)
29 – Kansas City Royals (metro population 1,904,908)
30 – Tampa Bay Devil Rays (metro population 2,531,908)
Most of the bottom 10 are in smaller markets, except for Detroit and Miami (Florida)
Tampa Bay and the Arizona D’Backs started franchises the same year. Both cities are big spring training sites. Both have major professional sports. Both play in super hot climates. Both have domed stadiums. Phoenix has about 1 million more people to draw from. Guess you could say that all 1 million of them go to a D’Backs game. Actually looking at comparisons between Tampa Bay and Arizona it ends up being more than the 1 million fans in the worst year and some 2 million more in the best years who attend Diamondback games vs Devil Ray games.
A look at the three teams from the states with spring training for all 30 teams.
Tampa metro - 2.5+ million population
Best attendance past 5 years 1,298,365 in 2001
Worst attendance past 5 years 1,058,695 in 2003
Phoenix metro - 3.5+ million population
Best attendance past 5 years 3,198,977 in 2002
Worst attendance past 5 years 2,059,331 last year
Miami metro – 5.2+ million population
Best attendance past 5 years 1,823,388 last year
Worst attendance past 5 years 813,118 in 2002
In 2002
Diamondbacks - 3,198,977
Devil Rays - 1,065,742 (2.13 million less than Arizona)
Marlins - 813,118 (2.38 million less than Arizona)
Below is a chart that shows all MLB clubs attendance figures over the past 5 years.
|
|
Key: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top 10 in MLB attendance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottom 10 in MLB attendance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest Attendance in 5 year span |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest Attendance in 5 year span |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATTENDANCE |
|
Home |
|
|
Road |
|
Overall |
|
|
Year |
Rank |
TEAM |
GMS |
TOTAL |
AVG |
GMS |
AVG |
GMS |
AVG |
|
2001 |
14 |
Arizona |
81 |
2,736,451 |
33,783 |
80 |
32,108 |
161 |
32,951 |
|
2002 |
4 |
Arizona |
81 |
3,198,977 |
39,493 |
80 |
33,705 |
161 |
36,617 |
|
2003 |
8 |
Arizona |
81 |
2,805,542 |
34,636 |
80 |
29,989 |
161 |
32,327 |
|
2004 |
14 |
Arizona |
81 |
2,519,560 |
31,105 |
80 |
30,948 |
161 |
31,027 |
|
2005 |
20 |
Arizona |
81 |
2,059,331 |
25,423 |
79 |
32,229 |
160 |
28,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
12 |
Atlanta |
81 |
2,823,530 |
34,858 |
80 |
28,814 |
161 |
31,855 |
|
2002 |
13 |
Atlanta |
81 |
2,603,484 |
32,141 |
79 |
26,952 |
160 |
29,579 |
|
2003 |
10 |
Atlanta |
79 |
2,401,084 |
30,393 |
81 |
28,309 |
160 |
29,338 |
|
2004 |
16 |
Atlanta |
79 |
2,322,565 |
29,399 |
80 |
30,000 |
159 |
29,701 |
|
2005 |
15 |
Atlanta |
80 |
2,521,534 |
31,519 |
80 |
32,811 |
160 |
32,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
6 |
Baltimore |
80 |
3,094,841 |
38,685 |
81 |
28,952 |
161 |
33,788 |
|
2002 |
10 |
Baltimore |
81 |
2,682,439 |
33,116 |
81 |
24,983 |
162 |
29,050 |
|
2003 |
11 |
Baltimore |
81 |
2,454,523 |
30,302 |
79 |
27,643 |
160 |
28,989 |
|
2004 |
12 |
Baltimore |
80 |
2,744,013 |
34,300 |
80 |
29,492 |
160 |
31,896 |
|
2005 |
14 |
Baltimore |
81 |
2,624,804 |
32,404 |
80 |
30,441 |
161 |
31,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
16 |
Boston |
81 |
2,625,333 |
32,411 |
80 |
34,025 |
161 |
33,213 |
|
2002 |
11 |
Boston |
81 |
2,650,862 |
32,726 |
80 |
30,925 |
161 |
31,831 |
|
2003 |
9 |
Boston |
81 |
2,724,165 |
33,631 |
80 |
30,544 |
161 |
32,097 |
|
2004 |
11 |
Boston |
81 |
2,837,304 |
35,028 |
80 |
36,009 |
161 |
35,515 |
|
2005 |
9 |
Boston |
80 |
2,813,354 |
35,166 |
81 |
37,735 |
161 |
36,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
10 |
Chicago Cubs |
79 |
2,779,465 |
35,183 |
81 |
34,928 |
160 |
35,053 |
|
2002 |
8 |
Chicago Cubs |
78 |
2,693,096 |
34,526 |
81 |
32,369 |
159 |
33,427 |
|
2003 |
6 |
Chicago Cubs |
80 |
2,962,630 |
37,032 |
80 |
33,406 |
160 |
35,219 |
|
2004 |
6 |
Chicago Cubs |
81 |
3,170,184 |
39,138 |
78 |
37,100 |
159 |
38,138 |
|
2005 |
6 |
Chicago Cubs |
80 |
3,100,262 |
38,753 |
80 |
36,389 |
160 |
37,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
26 |
Chicago W. Sox |
80 |
1,766,172 |
22,077 |
81 |
27,275 |
161 |
24,692 |
|
2002 |
23 |
Chicago W. Sox |
81 |
1,676,911 |
20,702 |
81 |
25,626 |
162 |
23,164 |
|
2003 |
21 |
Chicago W. Sox |
81 |
1,939,524 |
23,944 |
81 |
27,006 |
162 |
25,475 |
|
2004 |
21 |
Chicago W. Sox |
79 |
1,930,537 |
24,437 |
81 |
25,304 |
160 |
24,876 |
|
2005 |
17 |
Chicago W. Sox |
81 |
2,342,834 |
28,923 |
79 |
28,004 |
160 |
28,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
22 |
Cincinnati |
79 |
1,879,757 |
23,794 |
81 |
32,903 |
160 |
28,405 |
|
2002 |
21 |
Cincinnati |
80 |
1,855,787 |
23,197 |
81 |
28,614 |
161 |
25,922 |
|
2003 |
13 |
Cincinnati |
81 |
2,355,259 |
29,077 |
81 |
26,778 |
162 |
27,927 |
|
2004 |
18 |
Cincinnati |
81 |
2,287,250 |
28,237 |
81 |
30,977 |
162 |
29,607 |
|
2005 |
25 |
Cincinnati |
81 |
1,943,157 |
23,989 |
79 |
32,246 |
160 |
28,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
4 |
Cleveland |
80 |
3,175,523 |
39,694 |
81 |
29,277 |
161 |
34,453 |
|
2002 |
12 |
Cleveland |
81 |
2,616,940 |
32,307 |
80 |
24,141 |
161 |
28,250 |
|
2003 |
24 |
Cleveland |
81 |
1,730,002 |
21,358 |
80 |
24,487 |
161 |
22,913 |
|
2004 |
25 |
Cleveland |
81 |
1,814,401 |
22,400 |
80 |
27,316 |
161 |
24,843 |
|
2005 |
24 |
Cleveland |
80 |
1,973,185 |
24,664 |
81 |
27,432 |
161 |
26,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
5 |
Colorado |
81 |
3,166,821 |
39,096 |
81 |
30,835 |
162 |
34,966 |
|
2002 |
9 |
Colorado |
81 |
2,737,838 |
33,800 |
81 |
29,299 |
162 |
31,549 |
|
2003 |
15 |
Colorado |
81 |
2,334,085 |
28,815 |
79 |
27,865 |
160 |
28,346 |
|
2004 |
15 |
Colorado |
79 |
2,338,069 |
29,595 |
81 |
31,957 |
160 |
30,791 |
|
2005 |
26 |
Colorado |
80 |
1,915,586 |
23,944 |
80 |
31,175 |
160 |
27,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
21 |
Detroit |
80 |
1,921,305 |
24,016 |
80 |
27,632 |
160 |
25,824 |
|
2002 |
26 |
Detroit |
80 |
1,503,623 |
18,795 |
81 |
25,104 |
161 |
21,969 |
|
2003 |
27 |
Detroit |
80 |
1,368,245 |
17,103 |
81 |
24,205 |
161 |
20,676 |
|
2004 |
22 |
Detroit |
80 |
1,917,004 |
23,962 |
80 |
27,360 |
160 |
25,661 |
|
2005 |
21 |
Detroit |
80 |
2,024,505 |
25,306 |
78 |
26,437 |
158 |
25,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
29 |
Florida |
80 |
1,261,226 |
15,765 |
80 |
26,118 |
160 |
20,941 |
|
2002 |
29 |
Florida |
81 |
813,118 |
10,038 |
79 |
25,773 |
160 |
17,807 |
|
2003 |
28 |
Florida |
80 |
1,303,215 |
16,290 |
81 |
25,675 |
161 |
21,012 |
|
2004 |
26 |
Florida |
78 |
1,723,105 |
22,091 |
80 |
28,894 |
158 |
25,535 |
|
2005 |
28 |
Florida |
80 |
1,823,388 |
22,792 |
80 |
32,856 |
160 |
27,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
9 |
Houston |
81 |
2,904,277 |
35,855 |
80 |
29,335 |
161 |
32,615 |
|
2002 |
14 |
Houston |
81 |
2,517,357 |
31,078 |
81 |
27,669 |
162 |
29,373 |
|
2003 |
12 |
Houston |
81 |
2,454,241 |
30,299 |
81 |
27,576 |
162 |
28,937 |
|
2004 |
7 |
Houston |
81 |
3,087,872 |
38,121 |
80 |
30,762 |
161 |
34,465 |
|
2005 |
10 |
Houston |
80 |
2,762,472 |
34,530 |
80 |
30,652 |
160 |
32,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
27 |
Kansas City |
81 |
1,536,371 |
18,967 |
80 |
27,990 |
161 |
23,451 |
|
2002 |
27 |
Kansas City |
77 |
1,323,036 |
17,182 |
81 |
26,789 |
158 |
22,107 |
|
2003 |
22 |
Kansas City |
78 |
1,779,895 |
22,819 |
81 |
26,153 |
159 |
24,518 |
|
2004 |
28 |
Kansas City |
79 |
1,661,478 |
21,031 |
80 |
25,790 |
159 |
23,425 |
|
2005 |
29 |
Kansas City |
79 |
1,371,181 |
17,356 |
80 |
25,906 |
159 |
21,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
20 |
LA Angels |
81 |
2,000,919 |
24,702 |
81 |
30,852 |
162 |
27,777 |
|
2002 |
16 |
LA Angels |
81 |
2,305,547 |
28,463 |
80 |
26,799 |
161 |
27,636 |
|
2003 |
5 |
LA Angels |
81 |
3,061,094 |
37,791 |
80 |
27,213 |
161 |
32,535 |
|
2004 |
3 |
LA Angels |
81 |
3,375,677 |
41,675 |
81 |
29,524 |
162 |
35,599 |
|
2005 |
4 |
LA Angels |
81 |
3,404,686 |
42,033 |
79 |
30,684 |
160 |
36,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
8 |
LA Dodgers |
81 |
3,017,143 |
37,248 |
81 |
32,909 |
162 |
35,078 |
|
2002 |
5 |
LA Dodgers |
81 |
3,131,255 |
38,657 |
80 |
30,631 |
161 |
34,669 |
|
2003 |
4 |
LA Dodgers |
81 |
3,138,626 |
38,748 |
81 |
28,681 |
162 |
33,714 |
|
2004 |
2 |
LA Dodgers |
81 |
3,488,283 |
43,065 |
81 |
31,839 |
162 |
37,452 |
|
2005 |
2 |
LA Dodgers |
81 |
3,603,680 |
44,489 |
80 |
32,498 |
161 |
38,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
13 |
Milwaukee |
81 |
2,811,041 |
34,704 |
80 |
29,507 |
161 |
32,122 |
|
2002 |
19 |
Milwaukee |
81 |
1,969,153 |
24,310 |
80 |
26,404 |
161 |
25,350 |
|
2003 |
25 |
Milwaukee |
81 |
1,700,354 |
20,992 |
80 |
27,566 |
161 |
24,258 |
|
2004 |
20 |
Milwaukee |
81 |
2,062,382 |
25,461 |
79 |
29,747 |
160 |
27,577 |
|
2005 |
18 |
Milwaukee |
81 |
2,211,023 |
27,296 |
80 |
29,421 |
161 |
28,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
25 |
Minnesota |
80 |
1,782,926 |
22,286 |
|